Re: [Boost-build] Ping: Re: Running regression tests

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-07 18:11:53

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Saturday 07 October 2006 23:01, Rene Rivera wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> On Monday 18 September 2006 10:53, Vladimir Prus wrote:

>>> Sorry for bothering, but I noticed that your sequence.unique optimization
>>> causes a couple of tests to fail -- which is a bit annoying when I try to
>>> figure out of some change of mine caused real regressions.

>> Yes. But since I can't run the tests, in a meaningful way, it's
>> impossible for me to tell when such things happen :-(

> That's why I'm trying to find that's wrong ;-)

Not that I can tell all that well, since the test output is verbose, but 
  when I run the tests with either the unique optimization on and off 
they look about the same to me.

Which brings up another usage question; Is there a way to have a brief 
output mode on the tests? Something that just outputs the success or 
fail indicators so I can quickly, and more accurately, compare if there 
are differences between test runs.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo