From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-18 08:39:21
Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> There's actually good reason to have a separate name for
>> Borland-5.8, so maybe I should just go and change the auto-link code?
> I don't know ;-) Let me know what you decide -- I can just as well
> modify Boost.Build code to omit version number.
Hmm, thinking about this, maybe we should change bbv2 to omit the version
number like bbv1 did. When I originally tested this, the names were OK,
'cos I just had:
using borland ;
in my config file, but now that I've changed to support multiple borland
versions in my config the names are wrong :-(
What will be the method used by end users to build and install Boost with
bbv2? Will they have to edit config files first, or is there a simpler
syntax, and if so, is it "versioned" for Borland or not?
Just thinking out loud, and trying to get my head around this :-)
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk