From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-18 08:46:07
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 16:39, John Maddock wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> >> There's actually good reason to have a separate name for
> >> Borland-5.8, so maybe I should just go and change the auto-link code?
> > I don't know ;-) Let me know what you decide -- I can just as well
> > modify Boost.Build code to omit version number.
> Hmm, thinking about this, maybe we should change bbv2 to omit the version
> number like bbv1 did. When I originally tested this, the names were OK,
> 'cos I just had:
> using borland ;
> in my config file, but now that I've changed to support multiple borland
> versions in my config the names are wrong :-(
> What will be the method used by end users to build and install Boost with
> bbv2? Will they have to edit config files first, or is there a simpler
> syntax, and if so, is it "versioned" for Borland or not?
At the moment, they need to edit config files. We though that
can be used to auto-declare tooset, but in that case both "borland"
and "borland-5.8" seem to be reasonable names.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk