From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-06 05:04:18
On Monday 06 November 2006 12:34, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> >> Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >>>> We could "cheat" by replacing the v1 source files with a zipball --
> >>>> that wouldn't generate any inspection failures.
> >>> I'm all for just removing them. AFAIK the only reason they are still
> >>> around is that there are testers still using BBv1.
> >> Well if there are, that's gotta stop. They're not even getting
> >> complete results anymore; I have stopped maintaining v1 Jamfiles.
> > Well one way to make them stop is to remove the files :-) And by them
> > AFAICT it at least refers to:
> > http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/COMSOFT.h
> > http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_34_0/HP%20Test
> What makes you think so? I've been running with V2 for ages now.
I suppose lack of "-V2" in the tester id ;-)
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk