From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-06 06:53:19
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Monday 06 November 2006 12:34, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>>>> We could "cheat" by replacing the v1 source files with a zipball --
>>>>>> that wouldn't generate any inspection failures.
>>>>> I'm all for just removing them. AFAIK the only reason they are still
>>>>> around is that there are testers still using BBv1.
>>>> Well if there are, that's gotta stop. They're not even getting
>>>> complete results anymore; I have stopped maintaining v1 Jamfiles.
>>> Well one way to make them stop is to remove the files :-) And by them
>>> AFAICT it at least refers to:
>> What makes you think so? I've been running with V2 for ages now.
> I suppose lack of "-V2" in the tester id ;-)
Is this supposed to be the case? If yes, I must have missed it.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk