From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-07 02:10:55
Thomas Witt wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:04, Thomas Witt wrote:
>>> It was my understanding that we don't ship BBv1 with 1.34.0, but I might
>>> very well be wrong what's the plan?
>> I think the plan was to retain V1 for at least one release cycle.
> The question is whether we can cut corners here. I.e. what's the effort
> in maintaining and shipping it? If it's neglect-able we might do it.
> Otherwise I would say don't waste time on it.
> What do you think effort wise?
Pardon my butting in but given that the build instructions for the
libraries are still v1 based I don't see how it is possible to avoid
shipping it. See for instance more/getting_started.html in the RC_1_34_0
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk