From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-07 09:49:09
Nicola Musatti <Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:04, Thomas Witt wrote:
>>>> It was my understanding that we don't ship BBv1 with 1.34.0, but I might
>>>> very well be wrong what's the plan?
>>> I think the plan was to retain V1 for at least one release cycle.
>> The question is whether we can cut corners here. I.e. what's the effort
>> in maintaining and shipping it? If it's neglect-able we might do it.
>> Otherwise I would say don't waste time on it.
>> What do you think effort wise?
> Pardon my butting in but given that the build instructions for the
> libraries are still v1 based I don't see how it is possible to avoid
> shipping it. See for instance more/getting_started.html in the RC_1_34_0
I'm going to update those instructions, hopefully later today.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk