Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-11 21:32:24

Next message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-build] Wacky handling of MinGW"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-build] No OSPLAT for AMD64 Linux"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [Boost-build] [Bb]uild.jam?"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] [Bb]uild.jam?"
Reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] [Bb]uild.jam?"

David Abrahams wrote:
> Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>>> How would you make them more distinct?
>> Not use names that Perforce/Jam uses :-)
>
> Jamroot is OK in that regard.

True, although we already use "project-root.jam" at the boost-root
instead of Jamroot. And isn't this file the one we want to get rid of
since we determined it's superfluous?

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo

Next message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-build] Wacky handling of MinGW"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [Boost-build] No OSPLAT for AMD64 Linux"
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: [Boost-build] [Bb]uild.jam?"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] [Bb]uild.jam?"
Reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] [Bb]uild.jam?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk