Re: [Boost-build] No OSPLAT for AMD64 Linux

From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-11 21:25:33

Deane Yang wrote:
> Jared W. Robinson wrote:
>> It looks like I'm not the only one that has wanted jam.h updated to
>> define the OSPLAT.  OSPLAT, in my opinion, should always be defined --
>> for "sparc", "x86" and now "x86_64". Wouldn't it make sense to define
>> this in the Boost CVS sources rather than have several people maintain
>> their own patches?
> 
> 
> Yes, I support this request.
> 
>> Who will make this change? Rene?

Yea, that would be me. I'd need a patch against the CVS state posted to 
the SF tracker though.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo