From: Jared W. Robinson (jared.robinson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-19 13:22:41
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 08:25:33PM -0600, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Deane Yang wrote:
> > Jared W. Robinson wrote:
> >> It looks like I'm not the only one that has wanted jam.h updated to
> >> define the OSPLAT. OSPLAT, in my opinion, should always be defined --
> >> for "sparc", "x86" and now "x86_64". Wouldn't it make sense to define
> >> this in the Boost CVS sources rather than have several people maintain
> >> their own patches?
> > Yes, I support this request.
> >> Who will make this change? Rene?
> Yea, that would be me. I'd need a patch against the CVS state posted to
> the SF tracker though.
I'm not sure what you mean. Do you want me to create a patch and email
it to you? What is the "SF tracker"?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk