Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Alain Miniussi (alain.miniussi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-26 10:41:08

Next message: Daniel Lord: "Re: [Boost-build] Boost-build Digest, Vol 27, Issue 33"
Previous message: Bojan Resnik: "[Boost-build] No output or too much output"
In reply to: K. Noel Belcourt: "Re: [Boost-build] why is pathscale using mpicxx instead of pathCC ?"
Next in thread: Alain Miniussi: "Re: [Boost-build] why is pathscale using mpicxx instead of pathCC ?"
Reply: Alain Miniussi: "Re: [Boost-build] why is pathscale using mpicxx instead of pathCC ?"

On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:28:42 +0100, K. Noel Belcourt <kbelco_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> The attached patch replaces the mpi wrappers with the native
> compilers and adds the -f77 option to the fortran 77 action. I'll
> commit this patch if it looks reasonable to you.

It's ok as far as I can tell.

Thanks!

Alain

Next message: Daniel Lord: "Re: [Boost-build] Boost-build Digest, Vol 27, Issue 33"
Previous message: Bojan Resnik: "[Boost-build] No output or too much output"
In reply to: K. Noel Belcourt: "Re: [Boost-build] why is pathscale using mpicxx instead of pathCC ?"
Next in thread: Alain Miniussi: "Re: [Boost-build] why is pathscale using mpicxx instead of pathCC ?"
Reply: Alain Miniussi: "Re: [Boost-build] why is pathscale using mpicxx instead of pathCC ?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk