Re: [Boost-build] Target paths idea

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-04 13:12:01

on Mon Dec 03 2007, Vladimir Prus <ghost-AT-cs.msu.su> wrote:

>> Or you could just not represent the feature when it has its default
>> value, just as feature relevance worked in BBv1.
>
> You surely meant something else, as a feature that has its default value
> is *not* represented now. And "feature relevance" as I understand it
> is something else.

No, you're right; I was just confused, sorry.  Maybe per-project
settings should change what is considered the default value for the
purposes of target path construction.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com