From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-05 15:58:43
Jurko Gospodnetic' wrote:
> My suggestion would be to make Jamroot.jam and Jamfile.jam primary
> names for Boost Build Jamfiles and use those names consistently
> throughout all documentation and all example/test code.
Sure. I also prefer the names with extensions for the same reasons you
> Older variants such as project-root.jam, build.jam, Jamroot, Jamfile,
> etc. should be deprecated and slowly phased out. Older names could me
> made to display a (possibly optional) 'deprecated Jamfile name' warning.
Could you be specific as to which names you want to phase out?
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk