From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-15 11:19:15
Juergen Hunold wrote:
> I've been bitten by issue #83 again
> and decided to get a go and revive the last try recorded in
> and later reverted in
> I've attached a slightly modified version which hopefully puts target
> name prefixes at the right place.
> I've tested it with my source tree (5000+ targets, Qt4 based) and a full
> run of the boost regression test suite. I ran the Ublas-testsuite by
> hand to look for the regressions mentioned for the last try, but found
> Unfortunately, I'm yet unabled to run the Boost.Build python regression
> tests, so it would be nice if someone else could verify
> that "test/relative_sources.py" is still passing.
> Reviews of the proposed changes are welcome. I'd like to commit a
> (surely improved) version to trunk after 1.36 is out.
> Comments ?
Since I'm terrible at reading those diffs without the extra work, and
reading the ticket did illuminate either... Could you explain *what* and
*how* this fixes. And since I've fixed this outside BBv2 in my own
projects, which I'm posted code to that effect here before... How your
solution differs to mine of renaming the produced object files?
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk