Re: [Boost-build] Building on HP-UX

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-22 11:23:36

Hi Markus,

you remember it correctly. Some change in the Boost code on the trunk unearthed
latent bug in aC++ compiler. This is why many tests fail on PA-RISC with 
internal
compiler error. PA-RISC developers are aware of this.

Thanks,
  Boris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <boost-build_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost-build_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Building on HP-UX

> arno.schaefer_at_[hidden] wrote:
>> Hi Markus,
>>
>> sorry, but I didn't find there any results of a build
>> from a 32 bit compiler for PA-RISC? There is only a 64
>> bit compiler for probably the intanium architecture listet.
>>
>> regards
>> Arno
>
> Yes, you're right. The results for HP-UX_pa_risc_aCC are only on the trunk
> and not on the release report.
>
> Boris, I seem to remember that the HP-UX_pa_risc_aCC results on the trunk
> didn't have so many failures a few weeks ago. Is my mind playing tricks on me?
>
>
> Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
>