Subject: Re: [Boost-build] boost-build version shipping with boost libraries?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-08 21:34:33
Sebastian Hauer wrote:
> So far I've been using boost-build-2.0-m12 from the boost build web
> site: http://www.boost.org/doc/tools/build/index.html
> Yesterday I've been running into build problems porting my project to
> Mac OS X. I had no issues building boost 1.36 though. So I checked
> darwin.jam from my 2.0-m12 against whatever version which ships with
> the boost source libraries (which version is this anyway) and noticed
> that they differed quite a bit.
It's the version that ships with 1.36. I don't know that there is any other
name for it.
> I also noticed the link to boost jam on boost.org
> (http://www.boost.org/users/download/boost_jam_3_1_17). But no direct
> link to boost build's site at
> http://www.boost.org/doc/tools/build/index.html itself.
> I find this really confusing. Why is boost-jam shipping separately
> from boost-build and which version is recommended to be used
This one is pretty old.
> nightly snapshot
May be unstable.
> or whatever version ships with
> the boost libraries)?
This is probably the best option.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk