Subject: Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test
From: Anatoli Sakhnik (sakhnik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-27 01:11:47
I wish I could switch to the rule ârunâ either. Our code tends to
crash, deadlock and show other interesting things sometimes. So itâs
very convenient for us to have already built executable binary to
investigate it with gdb. Using the rule ârunâ, I needed to modify the
appropriate Jamfile, and build the binary in the second pass. That is
But the rule âunit-testâ prepares the binary without additional
efforts. Thatâs why Iâm going to use âunit-testâ in our new projects.
2009/5/27 Ian Emmons <iemmons_at_[hidden]>:
> I have seen numerous recommendation in this list to switch from using the
> unit-test target to the newer "run" target.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk