Subject: Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-27 09:43:28
Anatoli Sakhnik wrote:
> I wish I could switch to the rule ârunâ either. Our code tends to
> crash, deadlock and show other interesting things sometimes. So itâs
> very convenient for us to have already built executable binary to
> investigate it with gdb. Using the rule ârunâ, I needed to modify the
> appropriate Jamfile, and build the binary in the second pass. That is
> very inconvenient.
> But the rule âunit-testâ prepares the binary without additional
> efforts. Thatâs why Iâm going to use âunit-testâ in our new projects.
The <preserve-test-targets>on feature will prevent the
executable from being deleted by run.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk