Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Call of interest
From: Konstantin Litvinenko (to.darkangel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 02:45:34

Next message: Ian Emmons: "Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test"
Previous message: Anatoli Sakhnik: "Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test"
In reply to: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: [Boost-build] Call of interest"
Next in thread: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: [Boost-build] Call of interest"

Kevin Wheatley Ð¿Ð¸ÑˆÐµÑ‚:

> You may be interested in jamplus
> http://redmine.jamplex.org/projects/show/jamplus
>
> Which is reportedly similar in performance at least...

Thanks for pointing out. JamPlus is low level imperative, make-like
build system. The build systems performance is not an issue at all. The
most time consuming part is dependency scanning that has great
optimization opportunities.

Next message: Ian Emmons: "Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test"
Previous message: Anatoli Sakhnik: "Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test"
In reply to: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: [Boost-build] Call of interest"
Next in thread: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: [Boost-build] Call of interest"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk