Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test
From: Anatoli Sakhnik (sakhnik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 02:24:12

Next message: Konstantin Litvinenko: "Re: [Boost-build] Call of interest"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] Is this the right way to add compiler flags to specific libraries"
In reply to: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test"
Next in thread: Ian Emmons: "Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test"

Thanks a lot again! I must really have missed this feature when was
looking for the solution.

2009/5/27 Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>:
>
> The <preserve-test-targets>on feature will prevent the
> executable from being deleted by run.
>

Next message: Konstantin Litvinenko: "Re: [Boost-build] Call of interest"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] Is this the right way to add compiler flags to specific libraries"
In reply to: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test"
Next in thread: Ian Emmons: "Re: [Boost-build] run versus unit-test"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk