Re: [Boost-build] address-model as build requirement broken?

Subject: Re: [Boost-build] address-model as build requirement broken?
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir.prus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-09 03:00:26

John,

Seems like a bug. I will take a look but only on Tuesday - on vacation till
then. If anybody has ideas for a fix it will be great.

- Volodya

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015, 15:25 John Maddock <jz.maddock_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> There seems to be a recent(?) change to boost.build that means adding
> <address-model> as a build requirement is now broken.
>
> I have an existing Jamfile that basically builds the same program with a
> bunch of different compiler options and compares the results (see
>
> https://github.com/boostorg/math/blob/accuracy/reporting/performance/Jamfile.v2
> ),
> this used to work fine, but now I get:
>
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\feature.jam:782: in
> expand-composites from module feature
> error: explicitly-specified values of non-free feature <address-model>
> conflict
> error: existing values: 64 32
> error: value from expanding  <deduced-address-model>32 : 32
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\feature.jam:867: in
> feature.expand from module feature
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1070: in
> evaluate-requirements from module targets
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1112: in
> common-properties2 from module targets
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:977: in
> targets.common-properties from module targets
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1303: in
> class_at_basic-target.generate from module object(typed-target)@2026
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:774: in
> generate-really from module object(main-target)@2582
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:746: in
> class_at_main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@2582
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:895: in
> targets.generate-from-reference from module targets
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1266: in
> generate-dependencies from module object(alias-target-class)@2558
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:1323: in
> class_at_basic-target.generate from module object(alias-target-class)@2558
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:774: in
> generate-really from module object(main-target)@2647
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:746: in
> class_at_main-target.generate from module object(main-target)@2647
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src/build\targets.jam:272: in
> class_at_project-target.generate from module object(project-target)@1979
> M:/data/boost/boost/tools/build/src\build-system.jam:707: in load from
> module build-system
> M:\data\boost\boost\tools\build\src/kernel\modules.jam:295: in import
> from module modules
> M:\data\boost\boost\tools\build\src/kernel/bootstrap.jam:139: in
> boost-build from module
> M:\data\boost\boost\boost-build.jam:17: in module scope from module
>
> To reproduce just add:
>
> <toolset>msvc:<address-model>64
>
> as a build requirement to any otherwise trivial project and try and
> build with msvc.
>
> Does this ring a bell with anyone?
>
> Many thanks, John.
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
>
>