Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Tutorial corrections
From: Paulo MÃ¡rcio Figueiredo Alves (pauloalves1986_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-25 07:48:10
Yeah sorry, shame on me. It would be for the best, since the warning will
push them to update.
So deprecate it +1
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:36 AM Stefan Seefeld <stefan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 25.09.2015 07:22, Paulo MÃ¡rcio Figueiredo Alves wrote:
> > (Or may be it's time to deprecate some of them, such as the '.v2'
> > variants that, I assume, as there for only historical reasons.)
> > It sounds good, but I would deprecate only in the docs, not showing
> > warnings etc. Many may use it, I don't know.
> On the contrary, deprecating a feature means:
> * not documenting it at all
> * emitting a warning on its use
> Otherwise deprecation is void of any sense.
> ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk