Subject: Re: [Boost-build] Tutorial corrections
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir.prus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-25 07:57:41
Guess renaming .v2 to .jam in entire Boost C++ libraries codebase would be
I would not want a warning thought - no need to make users' life harder
over a cosmetic issue.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015, 14:48 Paulo MÃ¡rcio Figueiredo Alves <
> Yeah sorry, shame on me. It would be for the best, since the warning will
> push them to update.
> So deprecate it +1
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:36 AM Stefan Seefeld <stefan_at_[hidden]>
>> On 25.09.2015 07:22, Paulo MÃ¡rcio Figueiredo Alves wrote:
>> > (Or may be it's time to deprecate some of them, such as the '.v2'
>> > variants that, I assume, as there for only historical reasons.)
>> > It sounds good, but I would deprecate only in the docs, not showing
>> > warnings etc. Many may use it, I don't know.
>> On the contrary, deprecating a feature means:
>> * not documenting it at all
>> * emitting a warning on its use
>> Otherwise deprecation is void of any sense.
>> ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk