Subject: Re: [Boost-build] prototyping alternative Boost.Build syntax
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-28 13:44:59
When you do get all this figured out, you might want to summarize it in
terms of a formal grammar - similar to BNF or something like that. This
would explain things in a way that's decoupled from any implementation
features such as what language would be used.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk