Subject: Re: [Boost-build] prototyping alternative Boost.Build syntax
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-28 13:47:27
On 28.10.2016 13:44, Robert Ramey wrote:
> When you do get all this figured out, you might want to summarize it
> in terms of a formal grammar - similar to BNF or something like that.
> This would explain things in a way that's decoupled from any
> implementation features such as what language would be used.
Indeed, I agree !
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk