Boost logo

Boost Interest :

From: Doug Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-02 16:43:11

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>> Saw some discussion on this... here's the story. I'll skip discussion
>> of why one would want to do this at all :)
>> I believe this clears the way to check the cmake stuff in to the main
>> release branch alongside everything else: everything can happily coexist
>> with Boost.Build. We no longer need to do any reshuffling of
>> directories or adding svn:externals. I suppose that could get
>> political. Thoughts?
> Let's be brave.

I'd be thrilled to take this step, but I'd like to hear from Beman. Is
it acceptable for us to place our CMake build system into the trunk
and release branches? It will certainly help our development, and
we'll be using CMake to build graphical binary installers for Mac OS X
and Windows for 1.36.0.

  - Doug

Boost-cmake list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at