Boost logo

Boost Interest :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-02 20:59:25


Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>>> Saw some discussion on this... here's the story. I'll skip discussion
>>> of why one would want to do this at all :)
>>>
>>> I believe this clears the way to check the cmake stuff in to the main
>>> release branch alongside everything else: everything can happily coexist
>>> with Boost.Build. We no longer need to do any reshuffling of
>>> directories or adding svn:externals. I suppose that could get
>>> political. Thoughts?
>> Let's be brave.
>
> I'd be thrilled to take this step, but I'd like to hear from Beman. Is
> it acceptable for us to place our CMake build system into the trunk
> and release branches?

Whoa; I missed the suggestion that it go into release. My suggestion
is: trunk now, release after 1.35 ships.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Boost-cmake list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk