Re: [Boost-cmake] What we're doing testing-wise (was Status and future of boost-cmake)

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-03 07:03:39

Evan Wheeler wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> troy d. straszheim wrote:
>>
>>  
>>> The dashboardish trac plugin is slow (for various fixable reasons) and
>>> needs more features (it only has a couple of views), but it is easy to
>>> extend and I already find it useful.  I think it won't be long before we
>>> are more effective at communicating the current state of the release
>>> branch than the current testing system is, even with far fewer people
>>> and machines.   I expect this to be a big help making our case.
>>>     
>>
>> IMO speeding this thing up and improving the usefulness of the feedback
>> has to be made a much higher priority.  Currently it's so painful for me
>> to look at any results that I just don't bother.
>>
>>
>>   
> Agreed.  Troy and I knew that the current interface wasn't going to be
> the final product.  I started working on a new interface a few weeks
> back but then got swamped with day-job deadlines.  I just finished all
> that up today actually, so I should be able to make some good progress
> on the trac interface in the next couple weeks.

Very cool.  I'm looking forward to that!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com