Boost logo

Boost Interest :

Subject: Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update
From: Doug Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-07 15:53:29

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Michael Jackson
<mike.jackson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Any ideas on what we would like to keep "un-modularized" for now? Looking
> at the dependency
> graph here are my own thoughts on which libraries should probably be kept
> un-modularized for now:
> mpl
> functional
> integer
> detail
> utility
> exception
> function
> preprocessor
> concept_check
> concept
> config
> type_traits
> static_assert
> iterator
> tuple
> smart_ptr

Most of these look like they belong in the core. "detail" isn't a
library. I bet "function", "iterator", "tuple", and "smart_ptr" could
be pulled out and made into modular libraries, since they shouldn't
have all *that* many dependencies.

  - Doug

Boost-cmake list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at