Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update

Subject: Re: [Boost-cmake] CMake modularization update
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-10 11:47:29

on Fri Nov 07 2008, "Doug Gregor" <doug.gregor-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Michael Jackson
> <mike.jackson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>   Any ideas on what we would like to keep "un-modularized" for now? Looking
>> at the dependency
>> graph here are my own thoughts on which libraries should probably be kept
>> un-modularized for now:
>>
>>        mpl
>>        functional
>>        integer
>>        detail
>>        utility
>>        exception
>>        function
>>        preprocessor
>>        concept_check
>>        concept
>>        config
>>        type_traits
>>        static_assert
>>        iterator
>>        tuple
>>        smart_ptr
>
> Most of these look like they belong in the core. "detail" isn't a
> library. I bet "function", "iterator", "tuple", and "smart_ptr" could
> be pulled out and made into modular libraries, since they shouldn't
> have all *that* many dependencies.

Looks right to me.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com