[Boost-commit] svn:boost r41923 - sandbox/committee/LWG

From: hinnant_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-12-09 11:31:29

Author: hinnant
Date: 2007-12-09 11:31:29 EST (Sun, 09 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 41923
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/41923

Log:
Checked off Pete issue 28.

Text files modified: 
   sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html |     2 +-                                      
   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html	(original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html	2007-12-09 11:31:29 EST (Sun, 09 Dec 2007)
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
   <i>Added the usual boilerplate wording to the front matter for the clause. 
   Ditto date-time clause, which was also missing the boilerplate.</i><br>
 &nbsp;</li>
-  <li>condition_variable::timed_wait: the requirement that the function return 
+  <li>&#10004; condition_variable::timed_wait: the requirement that the function return 
   false if the time elapses means that when a blocked thread is released by 
   notify, the release code must check whether the time has elapsed, since the 
   timeout may not have been noticed earlier. Is this intentional? Seems more