[Boost-commit] svn:boost r41924 - sandbox/committee/LWG

From: hinnant_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-12-09 11:39:45

Author: hinnant
Date: 2007-12-09 11:39:44 EST (Sun, 09 Dec 2007)
New Revision: 41924
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/41924

Log:
Checked off Pete issue 32.

Text files modified: 
   sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html |     2 +-                                      
   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html	(original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/Pete_comments.html	2007-12-09 11:39:44 EST (Sun, 09 Dec 2007)
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
   requirements. i.e. "Mutex concepts" -> "Mutex requirements".  (Added by 
   Beman.)<br>
 &nbsp;</li>
-  <li>Anthony's wording [for issue 24] nails the problem 
+  <li>&#10004; Anthony's wording [for issue 24] nails the problem 
   for condition_variable, but we have the same problem with 
   condition_variable_any, and this looks more problematic. I was hoping that 
   condition_variable_any::wait would require only lock() and unlock() on the