|
|
Boost-Commit : |
Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r51664 - sandbox/committee/LWG
From: bdawes_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-03-09 15:59:03
Author: bemandawes
Date: 2009-03-09 15:59:02 EDT (Mon, 09 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 51664
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/51664
Log:
Add many links
Text files modified:
sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html 2009-03-09 15:59:02 EDT (Mon, 09 Mar 2009)
@@ -149,9 +149,9 @@
<td>
<p>
- Agreed. Duplicates CA2<tr valign="top">
+ Agreed. Duplicates CA2<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>CA-2
+ <p><a name="CA2">CA-2 </a>
<td>
<p style="margin-top: 0.04in">17 Library
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
<p align="left"><br>
<td>
- <p align="left">Agreed. Duplicates CA2<br>
+ <p align="left">Agreed. Duplicates CA2<br>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
@@ -1677,7 +1677,8 @@
<td>
<p>
- Tom Plum to open LWG issue; we believe this is related to LWG625<tr valign="top">
+ Tom Plum to open LWG issue; we believe this is related to
+ LWG625<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>UK<br>
164
@@ -1985,7 +1986,8 @@
<td>
<p>
- LWG is interested in N2814, but we're concerned whether CWG will accept
+ LWG is interested in
+ N2814, but we're concerned whether CWG will accept
language recommendations.<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>JP 23
@@ -2022,7 +2024,8 @@
<td>
<p>
- LWG is interested in N2814, but we're concerned whether CWG will accept
+ LWG is interested in
+ N2814, but we're concerned whether CWG will accept
language recommendations.<p>
add <type_traits> only. Alisdair will draft an issue.<tr valign="top">
@@ -2234,8 +2237,8 @@
[Being reviewed by Editor]<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>UK<br>
- 180
+ <p><a name="UK180">UK<br>
+ 180</a>
<td>
<p align="justify">17.6.5.10
@@ -2835,7 +2838,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- See UK 180<tr valign="top">
+ See UK 180<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>UK<br>
190
@@ -3306,7 +3309,7 @@
We believe that this is editorial.<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p align="left">US 65
+ <p align="left"><a name="US65">US 65</a>
<td>
<p align="left">20
@@ -3368,8 +3371,8 @@
<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>UK<br>
- 198
+ <p><a name="UK198">UK<br>
+ 198 </a>
<td>
<p align="justify">20
@@ -3421,7 +3424,7 @@
<p>
Agree that this is editorial -- forward to project editor. (effective
- duplicate of US 69)<tr valign="top">
+ duplicate of US 69)<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>UK<br>
199
@@ -3455,8 +3458,8 @@
Agree change 'program' to 'user' in clauses 20.1.1 and 20.1.2<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>UK<br>
- 200
+ <p><a name="UK200">UK<br>
+ 200</a>
<td>
<p align="justify">20.1.4
@@ -3821,7 +3824,7 @@
Agree. The need for aligned_union is compelling enough to reinstate.<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>US 69
+ <p><a name="US69">US 69</a>
<td>
<p>20.5
@@ -3843,7 +3846,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- Editorial (effective duplicate of UK 198). Forward to project editor.<tr valign="top">
+ Editorial (effective duplicate of UK 198). Forward to project editor.<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>UK<br>
205
@@ -4521,7 +4524,7 @@
Agree, though minor. Forward to project editor (who may disregard).<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>JP 41
+ <p><a name="JP41">JP 41</a>
<td>
<p align="left">20.6.16.2
@@ -4705,7 +4708,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- As with JP 41, these constraints are redundant given that function<> is
+ As with JP 41, these constraints are redundant given that function<> is
already constrained. So we recommend changing each occurence of "MoveConstructible"
to "class". Note: this issue is also present in func.wrap.func.nullptr.<tr valign="top">
<td>
@@ -4971,8 +4974,8 @@
<td>
<p align="left">Resolved by
<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2840.pdf">
- N2840</a>, accepted in New Jersey.<p align="left">See US 65 for detailed
- notes.<br>
+ N2840</a>, accepted in New Jersey.<p align="left">See <a href="#US65">US
+ 65</a> for detailed notes.<br>
<tr>
<td>
@@ -5454,7 +5457,8 @@
<td>
<p align="left">[time.duration] Agree except that there is a typo in the
proposed resolution. The member operators should be operator%=. This is
- also LWG issue 934.<br>
+ also LWG
+ issue 934.<br>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
@@ -5481,8 +5485,8 @@
[time.clock.hires] Agree. Forward to project editor.<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>UK<br>
- 216
+ <p><a name="UK216">UK<br>
+ 216</a>
<td>
<p align="justify">21
@@ -5505,10 +5509,11 @@
<p>
NB comments to be handled by Dave Abrahams and Howard Hinnant with advice
- from PJP: UK216 (which duplicates) JP46, JP48. JP46 supplies extensive
+ from PJP: UK216 (which duplicates) JP46, JP48.
+ JP46 supplies extensive
proposed wording; start there.<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>JP 46
+ <p><a name="JP46">JP 46 </a>
<td>
<p align="left">21.2, 21.3
@@ -6563,7 +6568,7 @@
<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>JP 48
+ <p><a name="JP48">JP 48</a>
<td>
<p align="left">21.3
@@ -6605,7 +6610,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- See UK 216<tr valign="top">
+ See UK 216<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>UK<br>
217
@@ -7570,8 +7575,8 @@
Agree. Proposed wording will be presented
in N2829 or D2840.<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>UK<br>
- 224
+ <p><a name="UK224">UK<br>
+ 224</a>
<td>
<p align="justify">23.1.1<br>
@@ -8217,7 +8222,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- Duplicate of UK 224.<tr valign="top">
+ Duplicate of UK 224.<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>UK<br>
242
@@ -8323,8 +8328,8 @@
Agree with the issue but not the details of the proposed solution. Walter to
provide wording for the new concept.<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>UK<br>
- 245
+ <p><a name="UK245">UK<br>
+ 245</a>
<td>
<p align="justify">23.2.3
@@ -8367,7 +8372,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- UK245 with additional comments on UK200 in clause 20: After further
+ UK245 with additional comments on UK200 in clause 20: After further
discussion of UK200, we do not think adding constraints to predicates is a
good idea. Straw poll on
UK245: status quo, 5 pro - 0 con; add copy-constructible, 1 pro - 3 con; no
@@ -9979,7 +9984,8 @@
value if the stream is empty
<td>
- <p align="left">Martin will address with existing LWG issue 788.<br>
+ <p align="left">Martin will address with existing LWG
+ issue 788.<br>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
@@ -12072,7 +12078,9 @@
<td>
<p align="left">Create an issue for concepts in the atomics chapter. See
- N2427. Needs to also consider issues 923 and 924.<br>
+ N2427. Needs to also consider issues
+ 923 and
+ 924.<br>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
@@ -12418,8 +12426,11 @@
<p align="left"><br>
<td>
- <p align="left">Hans to make proposal. See LWG Issue 926.<p align="left">
- UK 313 Update and LWG 926: Accept proposed resolution, correcting
+ <p align="left">Hans to make proposal. See LWG
+ Issue 926.<p align="left">
+ UK 313 Update and LWG
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#926">
+ 926</a>: Accept proposed resolution, correcting
spelling. Move to review state. Hans to ask additional review from cpp-threads.<br>
<tr valign="top">
@@ -12479,8 +12490,8 @@
typedefs.
<td>
- <p align="left">LWG Issue 937. Direct the editor to turn the types into
- typedefs as proposed in the comment. Paper approved by committee used
+ <p align="left">LWG
+ Issue 937. Direct the editor to turn the types into typedefs as proposed in the comment. Paper approved by committee used
typedefs, this appears to have been introduced as an editorial change.
Rationale: for compatibility with C.<tr valign="top">
<td>
@@ -12628,7 +12639,7 @@
<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p align="left">US 93
+ <p align="left"><a name="US93">US 93</a>
<td>
<p align="left">30
@@ -12676,7 +12687,7 @@
library, clause 30
<td>
- <p align="left">Duplicate of US 93.<br>
+ <p align="left">Duplicate of US 93.<br>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
@@ -12951,7 +12962,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- Subset of US 93. Should be addressed under the issue corresponding to US 93.<tr valign="top">
+ Subset of US 93. Should be addressed under the issue corresponding to US 93.<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>JP 78
@@ -13271,10 +13282,10 @@
<td>
<p>
- Related to JP 79 and therefore subset of US 93. Should be addressed under
+ Related to JP 79 and therefore subset of US 93. Should be addressed under
the issue corresponding to US 93.<tr valign="top">
<td>
- <p>JP 79
+ <p><a name="JP79">JP 79 </a>
<td>
<p align="left">30.5.1
@@ -13332,7 +13343,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- Subset of US 93. Should be addressed under the issue corresponding to US 93.<tr valign="top">
+ Subset of US 93. Should be addressed under the issue corresponding to US 93.<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>UK<br>
331
@@ -13425,7 +13436,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- Subset of US 93. Should be addressed under the issue corresponding to US 93.<tr valign="top">
+ Subset of US 93. Should be addressed under the issue corresponding to US 93.<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>UK<br>
334
@@ -13915,7 +13926,7 @@
<td>
<p>
- Subset of US 93. Should be addressed under the issue corresponding to US 93.
+ Subset of US 93. Should be addressed under the issue corresponding to US 93.
We do not consider this to be an editorial change.<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>DE-23
@@ -13944,7 +13955,8 @@
<td>
<p>
- Create issue, share with DE 25. See N2826. Attention: core group.<tr valign="top">
+ Create issue, share with DE 25. See
+ N2826. Attention: core group.<tr valign="top">
<td>
<p>DE-24
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk