|
Boost-Commit : |
Subject: [Boost-commit] svn:boost r51665 - sandbox/committee/LWG
From: bdawes_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-03-09 16:05:40
Author: bemandawes
Date: 2009-03-09 16:05:40 EDT (Mon, 09 Mar 2009)
New Revision: 51665
URL: http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/51665
Log:
Howard OK's a couple of resolutions.
Text files modified:
sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Modified: sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html
==============================================================================
--- sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html (original)
+++ sandbox/committee/LWG/LWG_0xCD1_status.html 2009-03-09 16:05:40 EDT (Mon, 09 Mar 2009)
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
<h1>Library Working Group<br>
Status of CD1 National Body Comments</h1>
<p>Revised:
-<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" S-Type="EDITED" S-Format="%d %b %Y %I:%M:%S %p %Z" startspan -->09 Mar 2009 12:29:55 PM -0500<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="42088" --></p>
+<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" S-Type="EDITED" S-Format="%d %b %Y %I:%M:%S %p %Z" startspan -->09 Mar 2009 02:59:59 PM -0500<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="42488" --></p>
<p>Disposition [Being reviewed by Editor] has been applied all Type Ed comments
which do not have a specific response from a sub-group.</p>
@@ -10622,10 +10622,10 @@
<p align="left"><br>
<td>
- <p align="left">Walter Brown recommends portions of this comment dealing
- with random numbers be treated as "Resolved by
+ <p align="left">The portions of this comment dealing
+ with random numbers are resolved by
<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2836.pdf">
- N2836</a>, which was accepted in New Jersey."<br>
+ N2836</a>, which was accepted in New Jersey.<br>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
@@ -10737,16 +10737,14 @@
<u>discrete_distribution(initializer_list<result_type>);</u>
<td>
- <p align="left">This is already covered by
+ <p align="left">Resolved by
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2836.pdf">
+ N2836</a>, which was accepted in New Jersey.</p>
+ <p align="left">This comment is also covered by
<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#874">
issue 874</a>. [Suggested by <span class="gI">
<span email="daniel.kruegler_at_[hidden]" class="gD">Daniel Krügler
- and confirmed by the submitter.]</span></span><p align="left">Also see
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2836.pdf">
- N2836</a>.<p align="left">Walter Brown recommends this comment be
- treated as "Resolved by
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2836.pdf">
- N2836</a>, which was accepted in New Jersey."<br>
+ and confirmed by the submitter.]</span></span><p align="left"><br>
<tr valign="top">
<td>
Boost-Commit list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk