Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] [boost] [Important] Boost moving to Subversion on Tuesday, July 31st
From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-27 20:34:22
On Jul 27, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
>> With respect to user docs, I agree that the best place is the website
>> and the boost release package.
> Ah, another aspect I've disagreed with in the past ;-) Not the user
> in the web site, but what kind of docs to put in the release package.
> One of the goals of the new web site is to reduce the amount of
> docs in
> the release package, to reduce maintenance. So we have to be careful
> what we include in the releases.
I'd like to see only the bare-minimum library+tool documentation in
Boost releases. All of the other content on the web site, from our
various policies to news items and history, should be on the web
In a (my) perfect world, all library and tool documentation would go
through the Quickbook/BoostBook documentation tool-chain and that's
all that would go into the releases. Everything else would be part of
the web site alone.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:40 UTC