Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] [Quickbook] Templates and Namespaces
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-03 23:18:46
on Thu Aug 02 2007, BjÃ¸rn Roald <bjorn-AT-4roald.org> wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> on Thu Aug 02 2007, BjÃ¸rn Roald <bjorn-AT-4roald.org> wrote:
>>> This only takes you a bit on the way. Code snippets and comments may be
>>> unbalanced at least when viewed as general text, contained strings,
>>> comments and '[' and ']' characters need to be ignored. So what is
>>> needed even with emacs is a quicbook mode.
> Neat, I will try it when I test out quickbook. I had the feeling you
> had this laying around.
>> But it sometimes has real performance problems. Emacs modes
>> are really hard to write.
> I know, I for one have never done much more than some simple hacking in
> However, the point of my posting was more directed at your statement
> that all editors can balance [ ]. Now I get the feeling you say it was
> hard to get it right, even in emacs ;-)
No, the [ ] balancing was right OOTB. It was other stuff that was
hard to get right.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:40 UTC