Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] questions about boost documentation
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-14 18:03:15
John Maddock wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
> The down side is that we don't have a way to automatically generate
> docs that are organised this way for "all of boost", so that we can
> avoid putting generated html in SVN.
Well, if you have a way of doing for one specific library - which
is necessary for the reasons previously stated, Making them all
is just a question of making a small script (*.sh or *.bat) - maybe
20 lines? which invokes the desired procedure on each library.
> Note that since the regex docs have only one "chapter" they are
> organised as an "article" doctype rather than a "library" or "book".
> Likewise this organisation lets you set up TOC depth and other
> preferences to suite the particular libraries docs.
> Hopefully the IDB folks will get this even better organised in
> time... but you're on the right track, the current "all in one"
> approach isn't going to be viable in the long run.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:40 UTC