Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] HTML to PDF translations?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-12 09:50:20
>>> I think we need to make it easier to get the toolchain working (figuring
>>> why it doesn't is the major hassle), and provide a template and testing
>>> to get new documenters started.
>> Don't forget a WYSIWYG editor:-)
I think a WYSIWYG editor is rather missing the point - DocBook is not based
around how things *look*, but around how they are *structured*. It's an
important conceptual difference IMO.
> I'd be happy with an emacs editing mode. Getting colorization and other
> dynamic feedback about the status of your markup is extremely valuable,
> even if it isn't strictly WYSIWYG. For example, when I'm editing
> ReStructuredText in emacs, it still shows me the markup I'm entering,
> but the text responds as I enter it. Italicized sections italicize,
> headings highlight, etc. That's enough to make editing a lot faster.
Nod, have you seen
haven't personally tried any of these, but they look to do most of what you
Personally I find emacs utterly incomprehensible so I'm not going to offer
to write you a syntax highlighter, but if any emacs experts would like to
chip here, I'd be more than happy to assist with the quickbook side of
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:40 UTC