Re: [Boost-docs] Inspection report failures

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Inspection report failures
From: troy d. straszheim (troy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-22 20:39:49

Daniel James wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]>:
>> is the latest release
>> candidate inspection report. If you click on the "Worst Offenders", it looks
>> as if many of the detail failures are license failures in generated .html
>> files.
>> What can we do about these failures? They are obscuring more important
>> failures I would like to start attacking.
> Gennadiy will have to deal with the failures in the test documentation
> as he doesn't seem to have checked in the source code.
> The failures in the 'doc' directory seem to be from variant, any,
> concepts and boost build. I think I can just add the license since all
> the authors are in the blanket permission file (apart from HP for
> concepts, so I'll leave their license in place) - it just requires the
> boost copyright to be added to the library information in the
> boostbook/quickbook source.

Oops, Beman, I owe you a bunch of license fixes, sorry. Getting right
on it.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC