Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] setup_boostbook.sh/.py
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-18 22:07:06
On 18 May 2010 20:36, Darren Garvey <lists.drrngrvy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 18 May 2010 20:08, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Does anyone use setup_boostbook.sh or setup_boostbook.py? I've just
>> noticed that they're currently not working and if no one's using them
>> it'll be easier to delete them than continue to maintain them.
> I find setup_boostbook.py useful for checking that I've set up everything
> and then updating user-config.jam.
> It didn't work last time I tried it but it does at least point out where
> it's failing.
setup_boostbook.py certainly fails better than setup_boostbook.sh. I
wonder if there's anyone who can run shell scripts but not python?
I think I should also ask on the developer list before doing anything.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC