Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Getting a draft watermark
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-16 17:09:15
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-docs-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-docs-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of
> Daniel James
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 5:00 PM
> To: Discussion of Boost Documentation
> Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Getting a draft watermark
> On 16 June 2011 16:11, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > I've asked for help on the Doxygen bugzilla site.
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652741
> > Bug 652741
> I wouldn't open a bug for that. It makes sense to set the background to white, as people set their
> backgrounds to custom colours - if you set the text colour you also need to set the background
> vice versa) to make sure the text is visible.
OK I can see that would be useful.
> Since you're editing the css, you can probably just put your rule after theirs, or change theirs
> 'background-color: white', which won't override 'background-image'.
'background-color: white' sounds more sensible.
Reading http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/colors.html, I'm still puzzled my specifying background-image
doesn't override the 'background : white" command.
But I'm getting tired and I've got my draft watermark...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC