Subject: [Boost-docs] quickbook/boostbook relationship
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-09 23:05:57
I thought I understood this:
// docbook includes all the transformations to generate "general purpose"
// xslt transforms docbook elements to html or whatever.
docbook xml ->xslt -> html or (fo ->pdf) or ?..
// boostbook adds a bunch of new elements specialized for C++ library
// xslt transforms this to docbook elements. The output of this
transformation can be used above.
boostbook xml -> xslt-> docbook xml
// quickbook defines a new "more convenient syntax" for C++ library
// quickbook transforms this syntax to boostbook syntax to be used above.
quickbook source -> quickbook -> boostbook xml.
OK this always made sense to me.
I look in the documentation for boost book xml and I find a lot of elements
such as function, method, etc with a fairly elaborate structure This also
sense since the object is to capture the "meaning" or "structure" of the
(and by implication the library being documented).
BUT when I look a the quickbook syntax I don't find a correspondence between
quickbook syntax and boost book xml definition. For example in boostbook
this is just the simplest example. boostbook covers the whole C++
I don't see how one would generate all this with the quickbook syntax. In
words it looks like quickbook is "quick" because it skips a lot of the
elements structure but maintains the formating - which is really quite a
thing than boostbook.
I would appreciated it if anyone who understands all this could shed some
light on it for me.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC