Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] methodname ref to overloaded operator
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-21 20:48:22
On 21 July 2012 21:34, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 7/21/2012 1:16 PM, Daniel James wrote:
>> On 21 July 2012 20:59, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Here's a very small work item for an XSLT hacker with a little time to
>>> kill. (He says wishfully.) I can't refer to an overloaded operator. If
>>> put this in a boostbook xml file:
>> A test case would help. Try the attached, it's untested.
> W00t! That works. I suppose all the operators would need to be handled
> similarly. Do you still need a test case?
Only 'operator()'. It strips of anything that starts with '(', I think
it's trying to deal with things like '<methodname>x::foo(int
y)</methodname>'. A full solution should probably do the same if
there's a '(' after 'operator()'. A test case would be good, I'm
trying to include one for anything new I add - it's hard to work out
what the script is meant to be doing, so it's useful to at least
illustrate what I think it should be doing.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 2017-11-11 08:50:41 UTC