Re: [Boost-docs] methodname ref to overloaded operator

Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] methodname ref to overloaded operator
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-21 21:07:54

On 7/21/2012 1:48 PM, Daniel James wrote:
> On 21 July 2012 21:34, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 7/21/2012 1:16 PM, Daniel James wrote:
>>> On 21 July 2012 20:59, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> Here's a very small work item for an XSLT hacker with a little time to
>>>> kill. (He says wishfully.) I can't refer to an overloaded operator. If
>>>> put this in a boostbook xml file:
>>>>
>>>> <methodname>proto::functional::as_env::operator()</methodname>
>>>
>>> A test case would help. Try the attached, it's untested.
>>
>> W00t! That works. I suppose all the operators would need to be handled
>> similarly. Do you still need a test case?
> 
> Only 'operator()'. It strips of anything that starts with '(', I think
> it's trying to deal with things like '<methodname>x::foo(int
> y)</methodname>'. 

Gotcha.

> A full solution should probably do the same if
> there's a '(' after 'operator()'. 

Picky, picky. :-)

> A test case would be good, I'm
> trying to include one for anything new I add - it's hard to work out
> what the script is meant to be doing, so it's useful to at least
> illustrate what I think it should be doing.

Very noble. Sure, I'll bang one together for you, hopefully tonight.

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com