From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-07-12 17:30:56
Naming things is hard .
While adding the gil/image_processing directory to our Doxygen config,
I've realised the current name may not necessarily be the best name.
For example, there are directories
- gil/image for implementation of the image class.
- gil/image_view for implementation of the image_view class
In most cases features in gil/image_processing will operate on instances
of image_view, but there may also be tools operating on more generic data
like raw arrays of numeric values or pixels and pixel elements.
So, scope indicating by the image_processing name may become too narrow.
Alternative name that I have been considering is just gil/processing.
What is others opinion?
Any suggestions for a good or better name?
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by Boost-Gil-Owners