Re: Bump BOOST_GIL_VERSION for Boost 1.72?

From: Pranam Lashkari (plashkari628_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-06 18:29:33

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:52 PM Mateusz Loskot <mateusz_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> I find it confusing too or at least useless.
> I'd prefer if we can stick to one, the Boost version.
>
> Shall we consider removing the whole `version.hpp` instead?
>
+1

GIL versions would have made more sense if it was an independent library
but as it is coupled with boost, boost versions are sufficient in my
opinion.

Thank you,
Pranam Lashkari