Re: Bump BOOST_GIL_VERSION for Boost 1.72?

From: stefan (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-06 19:50:17

On 2019-11-06 1:29 p.m., Pranam Lashkari wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:52 PM Mateusz Loskot <mateusz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> I find it confusing too or at least useless.
>> I'd prefer if we can stick to one, the Boost version.
>>
>> Shall we consider removing the whole `version.hpp` instead?
>>
> +1
>
> GIL versions would have made more sense if it was an independent library
> but as it is coupled with boost, boost versions are sufficient in my
> opinion.

I agree !

Stefan

--
       ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...