From: Pranam Lashkari (plashkari628_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-07 14:11:03
This sounds good to me
On Sun, 7 Jun, 2020, 7:27 pm Debabrata Mandal, <mandaldebabrata123_at_[hidden]>
> > A third approach would be to provide a mix of classes for std containers
> > > and overload for external classes which will deal with the problems of
> > both
> > > the above two points.
> > >
> > Can you show us a prototype to get a clearer idea?
> > Sorry, I got a bit delayed in replying back.
> What I meant was a possible mixture of the 2 current approaches i.e. pick
> up a simple standard container (like unordered_map) and provide a histogram
> container based on it. Also, we provide the function overloads in case we
> decided on extending the functionality to classes other than unordered_map.
> I am also coming up with the exact interface details in a subsequent mail.
> This ensures the usage syntax is kept simple, maintaining only one class as
> the official histogram class, easily testing the image processing
> algorithms on new container classes without having to rewrite or change the
> current interface and providing an easy way to migrate to other classes.
> Please let me know of your thoughts on this.
> Boost-gil mailing list
Boost list run by Boost-Gil-Owners