[Boost-maint] Fwd: [boost] Fwd: [typeof] unqualified enable_if in msvc-8.0 code is confused with Boost.Test boost::unit_test::decorator::enable_if

Subject: [Boost-maint] Fwd: [boost] Fwd: [typeof] unqualified enable_if in msvc-8.0 code is confused with Boost.Test boost::unit_test::decorator::enable_if
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-22 04:50:35

Forwarding request to boost-maint list.

The pull request:

https://github.com/boostorg/typeof/pull/1

looks quite trivial to me.

Boost.TypeOf is not community maintained. With the recent proposal
Beman made, CMT has the right to react even if the library still has a
formal maintainer. Does CMT have right to apply this patch? Is there a
procedure for this?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Fwd: [typeof] unqualified enable_if in msvc-8.0
code is confused with Boost.Test
boost::unit_test::decorator::enable_if
To: "boost_at_[hidden]" <boost_at_[hidden]>

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Menelaos Karavelas
<menelaos.karavelas_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> It has been more than a month since I created the pull request below, but
> had no feedback yet.
> I am explicitly cc'ing the typeof maintainers this time (emails from
> libs/maintainers.txt).
>
> This is a very simple pull request to handle (I would argue obvious). Could
> you please react?

I think this is the case when you can query for support in the CMT list.