Re: [Boost-testing] Intel 7.1-linux tarball results

From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-16 14:25:01

Martin Wille wrote:
>>> I'm afraid this could be caused by an update to the libc on my box.
>>> Some of the intel libraries explicitely refer to __ctype_b@@GLIBC_2.0
>>> However, on my box there's only GLIBC_2.3 stuff.
> (I tried to install glibc 2.0.6 in the meantime. However, that
> failed miserably due to syntax errors. Interestingly, glibc
> 2.0.6. recommends gcc 2.7.2.3 which I outright refuse to
> install.)

I'm ignorant in Linux development, but maybe this glibc release would 
work with gcc 2.95.3 ? Sorry for asking such stupid question; it's just 
hard to believe that Intel wants its users to use such old (and probably 
unavailable for download) compiler.

B.